# Independent Reviewer Recruitment Brief v0.7

The project needs two independent systematic-reviewers, one adjudicator, and one information specialist for an outcome-specific harms review of controlled 25 mg psilocybin administration in adults with major depressive disorder.

## Reviewers

Reviewers should have experience with clinical-trial screening and adverse-event extraction. At least one reviewer should understand psychiatric safety outcomes. Neither reviewer should report to the project author, share a financial interest in the result, or inspect the author's pilot decisions before locking first-pass work.

## Adjudicator

The adjudicator should have senior systematic-review methods experience and be able to distinguish serious adverse events, severe events, suicidality, rescue intervention, attribution, and incompatible follow-up windows.

## Information specialist

The information specialist should be able to peer-review and translate searches across MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, registries, and citation indexes.

## Scope and credit

The protocol, forms, and analysis infrastructure are prepared. The team must prospectively register the independent phase, execute searches, screen and extract in duplicate, adjudicate, and approve the final release. Contributor roles and authorship expectations should be agreed before work begins.